Early access

RecoverProof vs writing your own restore test script

You can absolutely build this yourself. Here's what that involves, so you can decide with eyes open.

A basic restore test is a weekend project: fetch the latest dump, restore it into a container, check the exit code. We even publish a tested script that does it. The question isn't whether you can build it, but what it takes to keep it trustworthy for years.

What a DIY script usually covers

What tends to be missing

GapWhy it matters
Monitoring the monitorWhen the cron job itself stops running, silence looks exactly like success. It needs a dead man's switch.
History"The orders table has 40,000 rows" means nothing without knowing it had 2 million last week. Catching shrinking tables, stale replicas and dropped tables needs stored results and comparisons.
Physical checksReading every row back and checking indexes (amcheck) catches corruption a successful restore can hide.
EvidenceAuditors want a record of every test: what was restored, the result, the duration, and how failures were handled. A log file on one server rarely survives to the audit.
UpkeepNew Postgres major versions, new databases, changed bucket layouts, rotated credentials. Each one silently breaks a script nobody owns any more.
SafetyRestored production data has to stay isolated and be deleted afterwards. Easy to get wrong in a quick script.

Honest guidance

Want the script without the upkeep? RecoverProof is that script, maintained, monitored and turned into audit evidence.

Get early access